IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH DALAM PENANGANAN KAWASAN PERMUKIMAN KUMUH KALI PEPE DI KECAMATAN PASAR KLIWON KOTA SURAKARTA
Abstract
This article examines the implementation of Surakarta City Government policy in
handling the Kali Pepe slum settlement area in Pasar Kliwon District. The study is
grounded in the problem that slum settlements are not merely physical housing
issues, but also involve social, economic, environmental, institutional, and landtenure complexities. The research uses a qualitative method with a descriptiveanalytical approach and a case study design. Data were collected through
observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation involving local government
officials, technical implementing agencies, community representatives, youth figures,
religious leaders, the press, and civil society organizations. The analysis applies
George C. Edward III’s policy implementation framework, which consists of four key
variables: communication, resources, disposition, and bureaucratic structure. The
findings show that the Surakarta City Government has implemented slum settlement
handling through a gradual, collaborative, and participatory approach, including
settlement improvement, infrastructure development, riverbank arrangement,
community involvement, and multi-stakeholder cooperation. However, the
implementation still faces several obstacles, including weak inter-agency
coordination, limited budget support, uneven technical capacity of implementing
officials, inadequate policy communication, community resistance, and unclear land
ownership status along the riverbank. The study concludes that the implementation
of slum settlement handling in Kali Pepe has shown progress, but it still requires
stronger institutional coordination, deeper community engagement, sustainable
financing, clearer land governance, and a more human-centered approach based on
the local principle of ngeuwongke. Strengthening these aspects is essential to ensure
that slum upgrading is not only physically successful, but also socially inclusive,
legally secure, and environmentally sustainable.
References
Congressional Quarterly Press.
Mardalis. (1995). Metode Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara.
Nasution, S. (1996). Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.
Yulianti, dkk. (2016). Evaluasi penataan kawasan permukiman kumuh: Studi kasus
Program Peremajaan Kawasan Tegalpanggung di Kota Yogyakarta.
Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Dinni, F., Sudiapermana, E., & Akhyadi, A. S. (2022). Investasi modal manusia dalam
pemberdayaan masyarakat permukiman kumuh perkotaan. Jurnal
Permukiman.
Rahmat, N. I., dkk. (2025). Analisis permasalahan permukiman kumuh di Kota
Mataram dengan pendekatan DPSIR.
Regulasi dan Dokumen Kebijakan
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 tentang Perumahan dan Kawasan
Permukiman.
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 14 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyelenggaraan
Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman.
Peraturan Daerah Kota Surakarta Nomor 7 Tahun 2023 tentang Penyelenggaraan
Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman.
Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh (KOTAKU). Dokumen kebijakan penanganan kawasan
permukiman kumuh perkotaan.
Pemerintah Kota Surakarta. Dokumen perencanaan dan kebijakan penanganan
kawasan permukiman kumuh Kota Surakarta.
Pemerintah Kota Surakarta. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Kota
Surakarta Tahun 2025–2029.
Dinas Perumahan, Kawasan Permukiman, dan Pertanahan Kota Surakarta.
Dokumen teknis penanganan kawasan permukiman kumuh Kota Surakarta.

.png)
.png)
