PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU HACKER DENGAN TUJUAN PEMESANAN FIKTIF

Fitri Sucia; Andi Pamungkas; Ali Akbar; Saptaning Ruju Paminto

doi:10.36859/jdh.v4i2.974

Fitri Sucia Universitas Suryakancana
Andi Pamungkas Universitas Suryakancana
Ali Akbar Universitas Suryakancana
Saptaning Ruju Paminto Universitas Suryakancana

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36859/jdh.v4i2.974

Keywords: Fictious, Hacking, Liability, Technology.

Abstract

Advances in science and technology have made the types and forms of crime more sophisticated and diverse. One of the most common crimes is hacking personal accounts with the aim of placing online orders for other people. Criminal liability is carried out to fulfill justice, if you have committed a crime and fulfill the elements specified in the law. The method used in this writing is normative juridical by conducting a study using books, journals, writings and using a case study approach with the decision Number 1597/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Jkt.Utr, with the aim of seeing how criminal responsibility in Indonesia is against perpetrators. who do Hackers to then place orders online on behalf of other people. Based on the results of the research conducted, it was concluded that the defendant Untung Arif Budiman fulfilled the elements of a criminal offense and was able to take responsibility for the mistakes committed which were against the law so that the judge sentenced the defendant to Article 35 in conjunction with Article 51 paragraph (1) of the Law. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions and Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Law of Criminal Procedure and other relevant laws and regulations.

References

Adami Chazawi. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian II. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.
Amir Ilyas. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Rengkang Education, 2012.
Andi Hamzah. Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: CV. Artha Jaya, 1984.
D. Dudeja, V. “Cyber Crime and Law Enforment.” Commonwealth Publisher, New Delhi 2, no. 2, 2002.
Dedi Mulyadi. “Kebijakan Publik Pastisipatif.” Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 3, 2014.
Dwidja Priyatno. Bunga Rampai Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta, 2018.
Eko, Hidayat. “Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia.” Asas: Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Islam 8, no. 2, (2016).
Feri Antoni Surbakti, Muhammad Mulyadi. Politik Hukum Pidana Terhadap Kejahatan Korporasi. Jakarta: PT. Softmedia, 2010.
M. Yahya Harahap. Beberapa Tinjauan Tentang Permasalahan Hukum. Bandung: PT. CItra Aditya Bakti, 1997.
Nafiun. “Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi, IPTEK, Perkembangan, Pengertian, Macam-Macam, Dampak Positif Dan Negatif.” Kompas, 2013.
Ngafifi, Muhamad. “Kemajuan Teknologi Dan Pola Hidup Manusia Dalam Perspektif Sosial Budaya.” Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi Dan Aplikasi 2, No. 1, 2014.
NKD, Feraditha. “Hacker Dan Jenis-Jenisnya.” Logique, 2021. https://www.logique.co.id/blog/2021/04/15/apa-itu-hacker/.
Roeslan Saleh. Pikiran-Pikiran Tentang Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2010.
Saptanig Ruju Paminto. “Peranan Pendidikan Pancasila Dalam Mengendalikan Pengaruh Objek Daring Online.” Jurnal Hukum 1, No. 2, 2021.
Trini Handayani. Fungsionalisasi Hukum Pidana Terhadap Perbuatan Perdagangan Organ Tubuh Manusia. Bandung: CV, Mandar Maju, 2012.
Waruwu, Vikardin, Ojak Nainggolan, and Jusnizar Sinaga. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Orderan Fiktif Ojek Online Yang Mengakibat Kerugian Pt. Grab Indonesia ( Studi Putusan Nomor 1507/Pid.Sus/2018/Pn.Mdn).” Jurnal Hukum PATIK 9, no. 3, 2020.