ANALISIS KRITIS TERHADAP GERAKAN NASIONAL LITERASI DIGITAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF GOOD GOVERNANCE

  • Dadan Kurnia Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani

Abstract

The paper analyzes the analysis of the National Digital Literacy Movement (GNLD) from the perspective of good governance with qualitative methods. This analysis is motivated by the pros and cons of GNLD. Those who view this movement as good at fighting hoaxes, fake news, fake news or other negative content that are judged by the wider community. Meanwhile, those who assess the assessment, this movement is an attempt by the government to lead public opinion to legitimize and silence voices criticizing government policies. Analysis of the conclusions of GNLD in the perspective of good governance that GNLD is a government effort to provide security services as well as members of the public in surfing in cyberspace.

References

Ali Romdhoni, 2013. Al-Qur'an dan Literasi. Depok: Literatur Nusantara
Atmoko, Pitoyo Widhi. 2015. Digitalisasi dan Alih Media. Malang: Universitas Bramelati.
Belshaw, D. A.J. (2011). What is digital literacy? A Pragmatic investigation, thesis. United Kingdom
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Pusat Bahasa, 2008. Jakarta., Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Donald, M. 1991. Origins of the modern mind: three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
Eko Indrajit, Richardus. (2002). Buku Pintar Linux : Membangun Aplikasi e-
Government. Jakarta :PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Eko Indrajit, Ricardus dkk. 2005. E Government in Action. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi
Eko Indrajit, Richardus. 2006. Electronic Government “Strategi Pembangunan Sistem Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Teknologi Digital”. Yogyakarta, Andi.
Gilster, P. 1997. Digital literacy, New York: Wiley.
Iriantara, Yosal. 2009. Literasi Media: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana,. Bandung, Simbiosa Rekatama Media
John Creswell, Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches, (California: SAGE Publications, 2014), hal.20
J. R. Raco, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Jenis, Karakteristik, dan Keunggulannya, (Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, 2010). Hal. 82-84
Kern, Richard (2000). Literacy & Language Teaching. Oxford : Oxford University Press
Laporan Tahunan SAFEnet 2018, Jalan Terjal Memperjuangkan Hak-hak Digital
Lexy Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011), hal.29
Rianto, budi dkk. 2012. Polri dan Aplikasi E-Government dalam pelayanan Publik. Surabaya. Putra Media Nusantara
Stuart D. Lee. 2001. Digital Imaging: a practical handbook. Londong: Facet Publising.
Wahab, Abdul. (1990) Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Negara. Jakarta, Rineka Cipta.
Wibawa, Samodera. 2009. Administrasi Negara Isu-Isu Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Internet
https://time.com/4457110/internet-trolls/, diakses pada 28 Agustus 2020
https://tirto.id/bullying-dan-penindasan-di-media-sosial-bVZj, diakses 27 Agustus 2020
https://radarsukabumi.com/berita-utama/youtuber-ferdian-paleka-bikin-ulah-ke-waria-rumahnya-dikepung-warga/, diakses pada 28 Agustus 2020
https://m.detik.com/news/berita/d-5152474/pernyataan-lengkap-panglima-tni-terkait-hoax-picu-perusakan-polsek-ciracas, diakses tanggal 31 Agustus 2020
https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2020/08/29/21490211/perusakan-polsek-ciracas-dipicu-kabar-bohong-yang-disebar-oknum-anggota, diakses 31 Agustus 2020
https://www.jawapos.com/nasional/28/12/2019/kaleidoskop-2019-karena-berita-hoax-kerusuhan-wamena-pecah/, diakses 30 Agustus 2020
https://m.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20190819203042-185-422838/kominfo-ungkap-temuan-hoaks-saat-rusuh-papua, diakses 30 Agustus 2020
https://sains.kompas.com/read/2019/09/24/170300323/kerusuhan-wamena-kenapa-kemarahan-karena-hoaks-bisa-sangat-merusak-?page=all, diakses 30 Agustus 2020
https://katadata.co.id/safrezifitra/digital/5e9a5512bcbb0/kementerian-kominfo-identifikasi-453-hoaks-sepanjang-maret-2019, diakses pada 30 Agustus 2020
https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/12/22/09371731/sepanjang-2018-pemerintah-
blokir-hampir-1-juta-situs-berkonten-negatif.
https://www.suara.com/news/2020/06/20/162716/pemerintah-dituding-hamburkan-uang-pajak-rakyat-untuk-bayar-buzzer, diakses 2 September 2020
https://cirebon.pikiran-rakyat.com/nasional/pr-04714641/istana-negara-dituding-kelola-buzzer-staf-pemerintah-gunakan-influencer-tapi-untuk-tujuan-positif, diakses 2 September 2020
https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/freedom-net-2018
Goody, J. & Watt, I. 1963. The consequences of literacy. Contemporary Studies in Society and History 5, http://www.proquest/umi/pqd.web Diunduh pada 30 Agustus 2020
https://m.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20200831180342-32-541271/istana-sebut-influencer-ujung-tombak-demokrasi-digital
https://www.suara.com/news/2020/06/20/162716/pemerintah-dituding-hamburkan-uang-pajak-rakyat-untuk-bayar-buzzer, diakses 2 September 2020
https://cirebon.pikiran-rakyat.com/nasional/pr-04714641/istana-negara-dituding-kelola-buzzer-staf-pemerintah-gunakan-influencer-tapi-untuk-tujuan-positif, diakses 2 September 2020
Published
2021-02-07
How to Cite
Kurnia, D. (2021). ANALISIS KRITIS TERHADAP GERAKAN NASIONAL LITERASI DIGITAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF GOOD GOVERNANCE. Jurnal Academia Praja, 4(1), 107-133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36859/jap.v4i1.321