Jurnal Dialektika Hukum adheres to the ethical guidelines for journal publications put forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Dialektika Hukum  journal is an essential in the developing of a respected network of knowledge. It is a reflection of the quality of the journal and the institutions. Peer-reviewed articles manages the scientific method. So, it is important to agree upon standards of ethical behavior for all parties involved in the journal publishing process: the author, the journal editor, the reviewers, the publisher and the society.

Publication decisions
The editor board of the Jurnal Dialektika Hukum journal is responsible in deciding which are articles should be published. The reserachers and readers must respect the decision of the editorial board. The editors should be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board.

Fair play
Editors are evaluating articles content without regard to gender, race, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship sexual orientation, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and editorial staffs must confidentialy any information about a submitted articles to anyone other.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished articles must not be used in an editor's own research without the permissions of the authors.

Duties of Reviewers

1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Reviewers assists the editor in making decisions, and also communicate through the editorial communications with the authors in improving the articles.

2. Confidentiality
Articles received for reviewing must be treated as confidential documents.

3. Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be objective.

4. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Information or ideas of articles must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

Duties of Authors

1. Reporting standards
The report of original research of an author should present an accurate account of the work performed and objective discussion. Data should be  accurate in the article. An article should be contained detail and references.

2. Data Access and Retention
Authors provide the raw data for editorial review of articles and should be prepared to provide data so public can access.

3. Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure original articles.

4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in representing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same article to more than one journal constitutes is unacceptable.

5. Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the articles/research of others must always be given. Authors should cite influential publications.

6. Authorship of the Paper
Authorship will be given to those who have made contribution to the conception, execution, interpretation or design of the article/research. Co-authors are all those who have made contributions. Contributors are others who have participated in some substantive aspects of the research.

7. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the research involves chemicals or equipment that have any unusual hazards, the authors must clearly mention in the articles.

8. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
Authors should disclose any financial or other substantive conflict of interest in their articles. All sources of financial support for the research should be disclosed.

9. Fundamental errors in published works
When authors discover fundamental error in their own published article, the authors should notify the editorial board and cooperate with the editors to correct the paper.