IDENTITAS DAN KEPENTINGAN DALAM KEBIJAKAN LUAR NEGERI INDONESIA TERHADAP ISU HAK ASASI MANUSIA ETNIS UIGHUR
Abstract
The human rights issues of the Uighur ethnic group have become the international spotlight as a result of the policies implemented by China government which are considered to have violated human rights. For Indonesia, the human rights issue of the Uighur ethnic group is a dilemma in itself that has emerged in foreign policy both at the bilateral level towards China and bilaterally through the UN Human Rights Council mechanism. Indonesia's foreign policy is considered ambiguous because it does not reflect Indonesia's position as a member of the UN Human Rights Council and Islamic solidarity. Therefore, this article attempts to discuss by presenting the question why there is ambiguity in Indonesia's foreign policy in responding to the human rights issue of the Uighur ethnic group? The discussion of this question was analyzed using a constructivist approach through identity and interests with the argument that Indonesia's foreign policy towards human rights issues of the Uighur ethnic group was based on personal and social identities, giving rise to differences in interests that must be achieved. The article was prepared using qualitative methods with secondary data used to support research arguments. This paper finds that the foreign policy presented by Indonesia as an alternative has emerged based on its identity as a developing country with an interest in maintaining and maintaining good relations with China and an identity as a global human rights promoter with an interest in avoiding politicization of the UN Human Rights Council by Western countries.
References
Akbar, Norvan. “Dukungan Pencalonan RI Sebagai Anggota Dewan HAM PBB 2020-2022.” infopublik.id, 2019. https://infopublik.id/kategori/sorot-politik-hukum/429941/dukungan-pencalonan-ri-sebagai-anggota-dewan-ham-pbb-2020-2022.
Alvian, Rizky Alif, Ganesh Cintika Putri, and Irfan Ardhani. “Haluan Baru Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia: Perbandingan Diplomasi ‘Middle Power’ Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono Dan Joko Widodo.” Jurnal Hubungan Internasional 6, no. 2 (2018): 148–63.
Andika, Muhammad Tri, and Allya Nur Aisyah. “Analisis Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia-China Di Era Presiden Joko Widodo : Benturan Kepentingan Ekonomi Dan Kedaulatan.” Indonesia Perspective 2, no. 2 (2017).
Anwar, Dewi Fortuna. “Indonesia-China Relations: To Be Handheld With Care.” Perspective. Singapore, 2019.
Aryo, Metta Anastashya. “Sikap Indonesia Mengenai Kasus Uighur Di China Menjadi Dilema Jokowi.” Pusat Studi Kemanusiaan dan Pembangunan, 2020. http://www.pskp.or.id/2020/10/04/sikap-indonesia-mengenai-kasus-uighur-di-china-menjadi-dilema-jokowi/.
Asia Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. “Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity in Xinjiang? Applying the Legal Tests.” Queensland, 2020.
Badan Koordinator Penanaman Modal. “Realisasi Lampaui Target Kemeninvest Optimis.” siaran pers bkpm.go.id, 2022. https://www.bkpm.go.id/images/uploads/file_siaran_pers/Siaran_Pers_270%0A122_-_Realisasi_Lampaui_Target_Kemeninvest_Optimis.pdf.
Clunan, Anne L. The Social Construction of Russia`s Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity and Security Interest. Baltimore: The Jhons Hopkins University Press, 2009.
Creswell, Jhon W. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approach. London: Sage, 2014.
Darwich, May. Threats and Alliances in Middle East : Saudi and Syirian Policies in a Turbulent Region. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Fathurrahmi, Farah, Nisrina Nadhifa Rahman, Rei Firdha Amalia, and Ahmad Masihuddin. “Hak Azasi Manusia Dalam Kebijakan Luar Negeri.” KontraS. Jakarta, 2014.
Fatikasari, Rizkya, and Arin Fithriana. “Kontroversi Kebijakan Re-Edukasi Terhadap Etnis Uighur Oleh Pemerintah Tiongkok Dalam Perspektif Hak Azasi Manusia.” Budi Luhur Journal of Contemporary Diplomacy 2, no. 2 (2019): 177–85.
Fiadi, Ilham Rilin. “Tindakan Indonesia Dan Arab Saudi Dalam Isu Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Etnis Uighur Di Xinjiang Tahun 2019.” Jurnal Populika 10, no. 1 (2022): 22–32.
Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1996. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501707384.
Gaffar, Janendri M. “Sikap Kritis Negara Berkembang Terhadap Hukum Internasional.” Jurnal Konstitusi 10, no. 2 (2013): 205–2019.
Gurinda, Natanael Christian Henry. “Peran PBB Dalam Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Menurut Kajian Hukum Internasional.” Lex Et Societatis 7, no. 9 (2019): 54–61.
Habib, Achsanul. “Alasan RI Tolak Debat Isu Muslim Uighur Di PBB.” cnnindonesia.com, 2022. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20221008144226-106-858034/alasan-ri-tolak-debat-isu-muslim-uighur-di-pbb.
Haryanto, Agus, and Isman Pasha. Diplomasi Indonesia Realitas Dan Prospek. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu, 2016.
Houghton, David. “Constructivist Analyses of Foreign Policy.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.400.
Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict. “Explaining Indonesia`s Silence on The Uyghur Issues, Dalam Politicisation of The Uyghur Issue 2017-2018.” Jakarta, 2019. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep24208.6.
Kementrian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia. “Indonesia Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Kementrian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia.” Kemlu.go.id, 2019. https://kemlu.go.id/portal/id/read/40/halaman_list_lainnya/indonesia-dan-hak-asasi-manusia.
———. “Indonesia Dan Hak Azasi Manusia.” Kemlu.go.id, 2019. https://kemlu.go.id/portal/id/read/40/halaman_list_lainnya/indonesia-dan-hak-asasi-manusia.
Kumparan. “RI Pilih Tolak Di Voting PBB Soal Debat Pelanggaran HAM China Terhadap Uighur.” KumparanNews, 2022. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/ri-pilih-tolak-di-voting-pbb-soal-debat-pelanggaran-ham-china-terhadap-uighur-1z02E3n3WOZ/full.
Monzingo, D. Chinese Policy Toward Indonesia 1949-1967. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1976.
Munatama, Anisya, and Kiki Zhaidah. “Analisis Kerjasama Bilateral Sosial Politik China Dan Indonesia Dalam Masa Kepemimpinan Joko Widodo 2014-2019.” Jurnal Artefak 10, no. 1 (2023): 77–89.
Oktavia, Enika Maya. “Islam Dalam Kebijakan Luar Negeri Indonesia Terhadap Cina Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Etnis Uighur.” Jurnal Restorasi Hukum 6, no. 2 (2023): 130–45.
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. World Our Making : Rule and Rules in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989.
Peltonen, Hannes. “A Tale of Two Cognitions: The Evolution of Social Constructivism in International Relations.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 60, no. 1 (2017): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201700105.
Prabowo, Tri Bagus, and Rezya Agnesica Sihaloho. “Analisis Ketergantungan Indonesia Pada Teknologi Asing Dalam Sektor Energi Dan Dampaknya Pada Keamanan Nasional.” Jurnal Lemhanas RI 11, no. 1 (2023): 72–83.
Pradana, Hafid Adim. “Persepsi Suharto Dan Perubahan Kebijakan Luar Neger Indonesia Terhadap Cina Pada Awal Era Orde Baru.” Indonesia Perspective 1, no. 1 (2016): 23–42.
Pradityo, Ramadhanu. “Indonesia Diantara Masalah Etnis Rohingya Dan Etnis Uighur 2014-2019.” Indonesian Perspective 5, no. 2 (2020): 138–518.
Pramono, Sugiarto, and Andi Purwono. “Konstruktivisme Dalam Studi Hubungan Internasional: Gagasan Dan Posisi Teoritik.” Spektrum 7, no. 2 (2010): 14–20.
Prasetia, Andhika. “Moeldoko Soal Muslim Uighur: RI Tak Ikut Campur Urusan China.” detik.com, 2019. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4833204/moeldoko-soal-muslim-uighur-ri-tak-ikut-campur-urusan-china.
Pundilaras, Berliana, and Hasbi Aswar. “Peran PBB Dan Hambatan Yang Dihadapi Dalam Menangani Isu Pelanggaran HAM China Terhadap Etnis Uighur Di Xinjiang Tahun 2018-2022.” The Journal of Islamic Studies and International Relations 6 (2023): 51–82.
Putri, Firsty Adinda, and Gonda Yumitro. “Pelanggaran HAM Etnis Muslim Uighur Oleh Pemerintah China Di Xinjiang.” Journal of Contemporary Diplomacy 6, no. 1 (2022): 15–22.
Putri, Sindy Yulia, and Dairatul Ma`arif. “Dinamika Hubungan Kerja Sama Indonesia-Cina Di Era Pemerintahan Joko Widodo.” Jurnal Kajian Lemhanas RI 37 (2019): 15–25.
Rohman, Abid, Chabib Musthofa, Moh Fathoni Hakim, Muhammad Qobidl ‘Ainul Arif, Ridha Amaliyah, Rizki Rahmadini Nurika, and Zaky Ismail. “Islam, Indonesia, Tiongkok: Analisis Potensi Peningkatan People to People Connectivity Antara Indonesia-Tiongkok Perspektif Elite Muslim Indonesia.” Surabaya, 2020.
Rohman, Syaiful, and Marthen Napang. “Political-Economy China in Southeast Asia and Between Impact on Indonesia Economy.” Media Ekonomi 30, no. 1 (September 5, 2022): 118–31. https://doi.org/10.25105/me.v30i1.9861.
Rosenau, James N., Gavin Boyd, and Kenneth W. Thompson. World Politics: An Introduction. New York: The Free Press, 1976.
Saragih, Muhammad Fajrin, Sulaiman Hamid, and Makdin Muthe. “Tinjauan Yuridis Pelanggaran HAM Terhadap Etnis Muslim Uighur Di China Ditinjau Dari Hukum Humaniter.” Journal of USU International Law 4, no. 2 (2019).
Stets, Jan, and Peter Burke. “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 63, no. 3 (2000): 224–37.
Sudrajat, Shinta Azzahra. “Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Sebagai Bentuk Kebijakan Politik Dalam Pelaksanaan Perlindungan.” Definis: Jurnal Agama Dan Sosial-Humaniora 1, no. 1 (2022): 17–28.
Sukendar. “Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Kebijakan Luar Negeri Indonesia.” Sawala: Jurnal Administasi Negara 3, no. 2 (2015): 70–76.
Suryadinata, Leo. Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia Di Bawah Suharto. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1998.
Taris, Hashfi. “The Responsibility of People`s Republic of China for Alleged Human Rights Violations against the Uighurs.” Pajajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 3 (2019): 619–37.
Utomo, Satriyono Priyo. “Indonesia, Tiongkok Dan Komunisme 1949-1965.” Indonesian Perspective 2, no. 1 (2017): 65–79.
Wardah, Fathiyah. “Indonesia Tolak Dewan HAM PBB Bahasa Isu Uighur Di Xinjiang.” Voa Indonesia, 2022. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/indonesia-tolak-dewan-ham-pbb-bahas-isu-uighur-di-xinjiang/6780205.html.
Wendt. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It : The Social Construction of Power Politics Author ( s ): Alexander Wendt Published by : The MIT Press Stable URL : Http://Www.Jstor.Org/Stable/2706858.” International Organization 46, no. 2 (1992): 391–425.
Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Wibowo, I, and Syamsul Hadi. Merangkul China : Hubungan Indonesia-Cina Pasca-Soeharto. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2009.
Yuni, Revita, Pasca Dwi Putra, and Dedi Lanova Hutabarat. “Sinergi Indonesia Menuju Negara Maju.” In Strategi Dunia Usaha Menyikapi Status Indonesia Sebagai Negara Maju Pra Dan Pasca Covid-19. Medan: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Medan, 2020.
Zakiyya, Adis, and Chandra Purnama. “Pembangunan Infrastruktur Di Indonesia Dalam Kerja Sama Indonesia-Tiongkok Tahun 2010-2018.” Padjadjaran Journal of International Relations 4, no. 2 (August 12, 2022): 92. https://doi.org/10.24198/padjir.v4i2.39364.
Zulkarnain, and Syifa Nur Ghonimah. “Respon Turki Terhadap Tindakan Diskriminasi Pemerintah Cina Kepada Etnis Uighur Di Xinjiang (2009-2015).” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 5, no. 10 (2020): 1215–31.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Dinamika Global, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani as publisher of the journal.
Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Jurnal Dinamika Global, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal Dinamika Global are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors
