BREXIT REFERENDUM OF EUROPEAN UNION

AS TO RATIONAL CHOICE FOREIGN POLICY OF UNITED KINGDOM

  • Laode Muhamad Fathun
Keywords: Brexit, EU, Independence, Union Policy, rational choice

Abstract

This paper describes the phenomenon Brexit or Britain Exit on the future of EU regionalism and its impact on Indonesia. This paper will explain in detail the reason for the emergence of a number of policies Brexit. Brexit event caused much speculation related to Brexit in the European Union. The policy is considered full controversial, some experts say that Brexit in the European Union (EU) showed the independence of Britain as an independent state. Other hand, that Britain is the "ancestor" of the Europeans was struck with the release of the policy, meaning European history  can  not  be  separated  from  the  history  of  Britain.  In  fact  the above reasons that Britain came out associated with independence as an independent state related to EU policies that are too large, as a result of the policy model is very holistic policy while Britain desire is wholistic policy,  especially  in  the  economic,  political,  social  and  cultural.  In addition,  the  geopolitical  location  of  the  EU  headquarters  in  Brussels who also became the dominant actor in a union policy that demands as EU  countries  have  been  involved  in  the  formulation  of  development policy, including controversial is related to the ration immigrants. Other reason is the prestige associated with the currency. Although long since Britain does not fully adopt the EU rules but there is the possibility in the EU currency union can only occur with the assumption that the creation of functional perfect integration.

References

Carlsnaes, Walter, Dkk, 2013. Handbook of International Relational trjmh.

Nusamedia: Bandung.

Evans, Eric J., 2013. “Thatcher and Thatcerism” third edition. Routledge: London.
Forster, Anthony. 2002. “Euroscepticism in Contemporary British Politics: Opposition to Europe in the British Conservative and Labour Parties since 1945”. Routledge: London.
Gifford, Chris. 2008. Eurosceptic Thatcherism dalam The Making of Eurosceptic Britain: Identity and Economy in a Post-Imperial State. Ashgate Publishing: England.
Lewis, Oliver,. 2013. “Lessons from 1975 renegotiation” .Bussines for

Britain: London.

May, Rudy T, 2003, Hubungan Internasional Kontemporer danMasalah- Masalah Global, PT.Rafika Aditama: Bandung.
Moller, Almut dan Tim Oliver. 2014. The United Kingdom and the European Union: What would a “Brexit” mean for the EU and other States around the world. Germany: The German Council on Foreign Relations: Germany.
Muhamad Fathun, Laode. 2016, Transformasi Isu-Isu Hubungan Internasional Pasca Perang Dingin: Magister Hubungan Internasional, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta.
Nugroho, Wahyu Bambang dan Hanafi, Ahmad Rais,2012, Theory Talks: Perbincangan Pakar Sedunia Tentang Teori Hubungan Internasional Abad Ke 21, Lembaga Pengembangan Pendidikan, Penelitian dan Masyarakat (LP3M) UMY.
(ed), 2014, Teori –Teori Hubungan Internasional Sebuah Sirvei

Konfrehensif, UMY: Yogyakarta.

Partogi Nainggolan, Poltak,. “Brexit”, penyebab dan Implikasi globalnya.

Vol. VIII, No. 12/II/P3DI/Juni/2016: Pusat Penelitian Badan

Keahlian DPR RI www.pengkajian.dpr.go.id ISSN 2088-2351.

Robert, Keohane, dan Nye, Joseph,.1977, Power and Interdependence: World Politic in Transition, Little Brown: Boston.
Thillien, Dexter “In or Out? The UK and The EU”, Global Politics, 2008, http://www.global-politics.co.uk/Issue%205/UK%20EU.htm, (diaksestanggal 25 Juni 2012).
Young, John W. 2000. “Britain and the European Unity 1945-

1999”.Macmillan Press: Houndmills.
Published
2020-07-05
How to Cite
Fathun, L. M. (2020). BREXIT REFERENDUM OF EUROPEAN UNION, 5(01), 65-83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36859/jdg.v5i1.193