STRATEGI RESOLUSI DILEMA KEAMANAN DALAM PEMBUATAN KEBIJAKAN PERTAHANAN NEGARA
Abstract
Abstract
This research explores the security dilemma and its implications for national defense policies, aiming to identify effective resolution strategies. Using qualitative research methods with secondary data, the study examines historical influences, mechanisms of diplomatic engagement, and technological advances in defense. According to historical analysis, the Security Dilemma influenced defense strategies that included nuclear deterrence and arms races during the Cold War. Diplomatic engagement through military hotlines, arms control agreements, and bilateral meetings emerges as pivotal in mitigating tensions. These measures foster trust and reduce misunderstandings, which are crucial for enhancing international security. Furthermore, leveraging defensive technologies such as missile defense systems and cyber capabilities proves essential in deterring threats while minimizing perceived aggression. The findings suggest that transparency, mutual interests, and effective communication are critical in managing these technologies to avoid escalating the security dilemma. In conclusion, the study underscores the importance of balanced defense strategies integrating diplomatic initiatives and advanced technologies to promote stability and prevent conflicts.
Keywords: diplomatic engagement, national defense policy, security dilemma, technological advancements.
References
Ambrose, M. J. (2018). The control agenda: a history of the strategic arms limitation talks. Cornell University Press.
Arner, D. W., Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., & Barberis, J. N. (2019). The identity challenge in finance: from analogue identity to digitized identification to digital KYC utilities. European Business Organization Law Review, 20, 55–80.
Biden, J. R. (2021). Interim national security strategic guidance. The White House, 8.
Bowen, W. Q., Elbahtimy, H., Hobbs, C., & Moran, M. (2018). Trust in Nuclear Disarmament Verification. Springer.
Brooks, R. (2016). How everything became war and the military became everything: Tales from the Pentagon. Simon and Schuster.
Buryj, M. (2020). Cold War Proxy Wars: A Threat To The Unipolar World Order, A Realist View.
Cameron, J. (2017). The Double Game: The Demise of America’s First Missile Defense System and the Rise of Strategic Arms Limitation. Oxford University Press.
Chisty, N. M. A., Baddam, P. R., & Amin, R. (2022). Strategic Approaches to Safeguarding the Digital Future: Insights into Next-Generation Cybersecurity. Engineering International, 10(2), 69–84.
Colaresi, M. P. (2014). Democracy declassified: the secrecy dilemma in national security. Oxford University Press, USA.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Freedman, L. (2023). Europe’s Crisis: Managing Relations with Russia. International Affairs Journal, 99(1), 45–67.
Fu, R. T. M., Gill, D. J., Hundman, E., Liff, A. P., & Ikenberry, G. J. (2015). Correspondence: Looking for Asia’s security dilemma. International Security, 40(2), 181–204.
Gaddis, J. L. (2006). The Cold War: a new history. Penguin.
Gallagher, N. W. (2015). Re-thinking the Unthinkable: Arms Control in the Twenty-First Century. The Nonproliferation Review, 22(3–4), 469–498.
Gehrig, M., Buchanan, C., Holt, S., & Ramsbotham, A. (2023). Building Trust in Peace Mediation.
Goldstein, A. (2022). China’s Rise and the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue. Foreign Policy Analysis, 18(3), 259–278.
Herz, J. H. (1950). Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 2(2), 157–180.
Hunter, Y. (2015). Sacred Suspicion: Religion and the Origins of the Cold War, 1880-1948 . (Doctoral dissertation).
Idarand, T., Stoicescu, K., & Anthony, I. (2023). Future of Arms Control: Ready to (Dis) Agree?. International Centre for Defence and Security (ICDS).
Iqbal, S., Rizvi, S. W. A., Haider, M. H., & Raza, S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Security and Defense: Explore the integration of AI in military strategies, security policies, and its implications for global power dynamics. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN AND SOCIETY, 3(4), 341–353.
Ismail, A., Hidajat, T., Dora, Y. M., Prasatia, F. E., & Pranadani, A. (2023). Leading the Digital Transformation: Evidence from Indonesia. Asadel Publisher.
Jones, P. (2014). Open skies: Transparency, confidence-building, and the end of the Cold War. Stanford University Press.
Karako, T. (2019). The missile defense review. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 13(2), 3–15.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye Jr, J. S. (1973). Power and interdependence. Survival, 15(4), 158–165.
Khan, P. W., Byun, Y.-C., & Park, N. (2020). A data verification system for CCTV surveillance cameras using blockchain technology in smart cities. Electronics, 9(3), 484.
Krishna, S. (2019). Identity, transparency and other visibilities: A liquid surveillance perspective of biometric identity. Available at SSRN 4404834.
Kruck, A., Oppermann, K., & Spencer, A. (Eds. ). (2018). Political mistakes and policy failures in international relations. palgrave macmillan.
Kupchan, C. (2022). International Institutions and the Mitigation of the Security Dilemma. Global Governance Review, 28(4), 354–360.
Kydd, A. (2020). Trust and Mistrust in International Relations. Princeton University Press.
La Boon, D. J. (2019). From Mutually Assured Destruction to Mutually Assured Stability: A Constructivist Rationale for Expanding Missile Defense. (Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University (Republic of Korea)).
Leirvik, O. (2014). Interreligious studies: A relational approach to religious activism and the study of religion. A&C Black.
Lewis, T. G. (2019). Critical infrastructure protection in homeland security: defending a networked nation. John Wiley & Sons.
Lindsay, J. R. (2020). The Impact of Cyber Capabilities on the Security Dilemma. Journal of Strategic Studies, 44(5), 723–745.
Lissner, R. (2021). The future of strategic arms control. Council on Foreign Relations.
Miller, S. E. (2021). Nuclear hotlines: Origins, evolution, applications. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 4(sup1), 176–191.
Proksch, S. (2016). Conflict management. Springer.
Regehr, E. (2020). Deterrence, Arms Control, and Cooperative Security.
Reilly III, R. L. (2020). Strategic Competition and Escalation Management in the 21 st Century: Russian Hybrid Warfare and China’s Rise. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver).
Rein, C. (2015). Enhancing peace and security in Africa through institutional cooperation. Contemporary Security Policy, 36(2), 267–295.
Robinson, J. (2016). Transparency and confidence-building measures for space security. Space Policy, 37, 134–144.
Rositzke, H. (2019). The CIA’s secret operations: espionage, counterespionage, and covert action. Routledge.
Sarjito, A., & Lelyana, N. (2023). Analisis Dampak Persepsi Ancaman Drone Terhadap Pembuatan Kebijakan Pertahanan Dan Proses Alokasi Sumber Daya. Jurnal of Management and Social Sciences, 1(4), 14–32.
Schmidt, H.-J. (2016). The Link between Conventional Arms Control and Crisis Management. OSCE Yearbook 2015, 267–276.
Teeple, N. J. (2020). Offensive Weapons and the Future of Arms Control. Canadian Journal of European and Russian Studies, 14(1), 79–102.
Venturini, J., & de Souza, M. R. (2021). We Need Greater Transparency and Debate on the Use of Surveillance Technology. SUR-Int’l J. on Hum Rts., 18, 175.
Waltz, K. N. (2010). Theory of international politics. Waveland Press.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics (Vol. 67). Cambridge university press.
Williams, H. (2021). Asymmetric arms control and strategic stability: Scenarios for limiting hypersonic glide vehicles. In Emerging Technologies and International Stability (pp. 195–219). Routledge.
Zaharna, R. S. (2014). Network purpose, network design: Dimensions of network and collaborative public diplomacy. In Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy (pp. 173–191). Routledge.
Zartman, I. W. (2015). Preventing deadly conflict. John Wiley & Sons.
Ziegler, C. E. (2021). A Crisis of Diverging Perspectives: US-Russian Relations and the Security Dilemma (Winter 2021).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Caraka Prabu, Department of Governmental Sciences, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani as publisher of the journal.
Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Jurnal Caraka Prabu, Department of Governmental Sciences, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal Caraka Prabu are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors.
