NETRALITAS WTO DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PERDAGANGAN ANTARA BRASIL VS AMERIKA SERIKAT
Abstract
Trade dispute cases between Brazil and the United States cover a wide range of issues, from agricultural subsidies to trade policy. However, the neutrality of the WTO in these cases is an aspect that stands out. The WTO strives not to favor any particular country, but rather adheres to the principles of objectivity and fairness. In resolving the dispute between Brazil and the United States, the WTO uses various mechanisms. One of them is the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB), which acts as a forum to resolve disputes between member countries. This process involves stages such as consultations, panels, and appellate bodies. Through this process, the WTO ensures that arguments and evidence from both sides are carefully considered before making a decision. The neutrality of the WTO is reflected in the decisions taken in these cases. While there may be political pressure from member countries, the WTO tries to be unaffected and decide based on the facts and applicable law. This is a very important principle in maintaining the integrity of the international trading system.
References
Aqimuddin, E. A. (2013). Resensi Buku: Hukum International; Netral Atau Berpihak?(Book Review: Does International Law Neutral or Not?). Book Review: Does International Law Neutral or Not.
Ardiyansah, A. (2021). Redesign of Customs Value Proof Mechanism by Customs Administration According to WTO Provisions (Dispute Study at Tax Court). IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 1(1), 115–131.
Athahirah, A. U., & Nurdin, N. (2022). Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM), Gender dan Demokrasi: sebuah tinjauan teoritis dan praktis. CV. Sketsa Media.
Bhagwati, J. (2008). Termites in the trading system: How preferential agreements undermine free trade. Oxford University Press.
Boldoczki, S., Thorenz, A., & Tuma, A. (2021). Does increased circularity lead to environmental sustainability?: The case of washing machine reuse in Germany. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(4), 864–876.
Dermoredjo, S. K., Masyhuri, M., Darwanto, D. H., & Mulyo, J. H. (2021). Kajian Ketersediaan Jagung dan Kedelai dalam Rangka Menghadapi Perdagangan Bebas: Kasus Negara-Negara ASEAN. SEPA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 8(2).
Erfan, Z., Hasan, A., Umar, M., & Khasyi’in, N. (2024). Politik Hukum Antar Bangsa (Siyasah Dauliyah Indonesia Dalam Perdamaian Dunia). Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 2(2), 767–787.
Estetika, M., Azhar, A., & Elake, G. L. (2022). Analisis Dinamika Perdagangan Internasional dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Kebijakan Perdagangan Proteksionisme Amerika Serikat. Sriwijaya Journal of International Relations, 2(2), 42–69.
Fathun, L. M. (2017). Proteksionisme Sengketa Dagang Dalam Perdagangan Internasional: Pendekatan Negosiasi Studi Kasus: Proteksionisme As Terhadap Impor Daging Kanada. Jurnal Asia Pacific Studies, 1(1), 15–27.
Fatmah, F., Supriyanto, E., Budiman, D., Maichal, M., Ghozali, Z., Ismail, H., Sutresna, A., Widyastuti, T. A. R., Pebrianti, T., & Isnaini, S. (2024). UMKM & Kewirausahaan: Panduan Praktis. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Grossman, G. M., & Sykes, A. O. (2006). United States–Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Certain Steel Products (WT/DS259; WT/DS252; WT/DS248; WT/DS249; WT/DS251; WT/DS258; WT/DS254; WT/DS253: DSR 2003: VII, 3117). World Trade Review, 5(S1), 146–187.
Hassanah, N. F. A. (2021). Kajian Yuridis Perjanjian Perdagangan Internasional Terkait Aturan Pembatasan dan Larangan Ekspor oleh World Trade Organization (Wto) (Studi Perjanjian antara Indonesia dan Uni Eropa). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum (Jimhum), 1(4), 1–12. https://jurnalmahasiswa.umsu.ac.id/index.php/jimhum/article/view/925/971
Kholilah, S. (2014). Respon Amerika Serikat Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Oleh Republik Rakyat Tiongkok Periode 2007-2010. Repository.Uinjkt.Ac.Id. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/42840
Kristianto. (n.d.). Critical Logic For Critical Purpose: Analisis Kritis Terhadap Gugatan Uni Eropa Atas Hilirisasi Nikel Di Indonesia 81hi2023.
Kurniadi, A. (2016). Kesepakatan Amerika Serikat Menyetujui Joint Plan Of Action (Jpoa) Dengan Iran Terhadap Program Pengembangan Nuklir Iran 2015. Jakarta: Fakultas ilmu Social Dan Ilmu politik UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Latif, B. (2020). Integrasi Prinsip Ekonomi dan Lingkungan dalam Perdagangan Bebas (Analisis terhadap Perjanjian Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean (MEA)). Universitas Hasanuddin.
Lestari, N. M. (2017). Strategi Brasil dalam Memenangkan Sengketa Kasus Subsidi Ekspor Gula Uni Eropa di World Trade Organization Tahun 2001-2006. Jurnal Analisis Hubungan Internasional, 6(2), 114–122.
Manurung, P. (2022). Internalisasi Norma Animal Welfare dalam World Trade Organization (WTO).
Muhamad, C. (2022). Peranan World Trade Organization Dalam Menangani Perang Dagang Antara Amerika Serikat Dan Tiongkok. (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Mataram).
Muhamad Candrawijaya. (2023). Peranan World Trade Organization Dalam Menangani Perang Dagang Antara Amerika Serikat Dan Tiongkok. Https://Www.Weforum.Org/Agenda/2019/05/More-Than-30-Years-Of-Us-Trade-With-China-In-One-Chart/.
Okonjo-Iweala, N. (2023). The WTO’S Contribution to the Challenges of Global Commons. Journal of International Economic Law, 26(1), 12–16.
Pramudyawati, R. D. (2024). Retaliasi Sebagai Opsi Alat Penegakan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdagangan Internasional Akibat Krisis di Badan Banding World Trade Organization. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 8394–8411.
Putri, D. P. (2013). Normalisasi Hubungan Bilateral Georgia-Rusia Pascakonflik Tahun 2008. UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.
Rohendi, A. (2013). Hukum Wto Dalam Sengketa Rokok Kretek Antara Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat. Seminar Nasional Inovasi Dan Tren (Snit), 59–64.
Sanib, S. S. (2019). Ketentuan-ketentuan TRIPS-Plus dalam Kerangka Perjanjian Perdagangan Bebas. Halu Oleo Law Review, 3(1), 50–66.
Saritha, P., & Satapathy, S. (2024). Anti-Dumping Measures and Competition Policy: A Comparative Study of India, EU, and USA.
Shofiana, R. V. (2014). Dampak Keputusan Konferensi Tingkat Menteri Wto Ke-9 Di Bali Terhadap Perekonomian Indonesia Pada Sektor Pertanian Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Global Trade Analysisproject (Gtap).
Simbolon, P. G. M., Yusro, M. A., & Taniady, V. (2024). Permanent Sovereignty vs. International Obligations: A Lesson Learned from the Dispute Settlement (DS)-592 between Indonesia and the European Union on International Trade. Lentera Hukum, 11, 189.
Snyder, F. (n.d.). Economic Globalization and the Law in the Twenty-first Century. The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, 624, 625–626.
Suherman, A. M. (2022). Hukum Perdagangan internasional: lembaga penyelesaian sengketa WTO dan Negara Berkembang. Sinar Grafika.
Superville, M. (2021). The WTO and Developing States. Available at SSRN 3858258.
Surinda, Y. (2012). Tolak Ukur Significantly Differ dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2000 Tentang Desain Industri. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Surinda, Y. (2022). Konsep Tanggung Jawab Menurut Teori Tanggung Jawab Dalam Hukum. ONLINE.
Susilo, B. E. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review: Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis E-Learning untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Matematis Siswa Indonesia. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 8(2), 213–229.
Trice, J. (2020). The Effect of US Steel Antidumping Duties on Trade Patterns and Trade Diversion.
Ukas, U., & Arman, Z. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Hubungan Hukum Internasional Dengan Hukum Nasional (Dalam Kajian Prespektif Teori). PETITA, 3(2), 249–258.
Wicaksono, R., & Nurhayati, I. (2022). Anti-Dumping Dispute Settlement of A4 Paper Products Export between Indonesia and Australia Penyelesaian Sengketa Anti-Dumping Ekspor Produk Kertas A4 antara Indonesia dengan Australia. Global Strategis, 16(1), 1–30. https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JGS/article/view/29043/24776
Wiratama, W. (2022). Kajian Hukum Terhadap Akuisisi Saham Asian Trails Holding Ltd. Oleh Travel Circle International (Mauritius) Ltd Ditinjau Dari Uu No. 5 Tahun 1999 (Studi Putusan Kppu Nomor 22/Kppu-M/2020).
World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Contribution Of Members To The Wto.
Yildiz, N. (2020). Effects of US-China trade disputes on global trade relations Case study: Latin America. Transnational Corporations Review, 12(2), 203–214.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Dinamika Global, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani as publisher of the journal.
Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Jurnal Dinamika Global, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal Dinamika Global are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors
