IMPLEMENTASI RETRIBUSI PELAYANAN PASAR BERDASARKAN PERATURAN DAERAH NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2023 DI KABUPATEN MAJALENGKA
Abstract
This article examines the implementation of market service retribution based on
Regional Regulation Number 7 of 2023 in Majalengka Regency, with a focus on UPT
Pasar Kadipaten, Pasar Sindangkasih, and Pasar Talaga. The study is grounded in
the problem that market service retribution has not been implemented optimally, as
reflected in manual collection mechanisms, weak trader compliance, limited firmness
among collection officers, inaccurate data on retribution objects, and uneven market
facilities. This article uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. Data
were collected through interviews, observation, and documentation involving the
Department of Trade and Industry, heads of market technical units, collection
officers, and market traders. The analysis applies Grindle’s policy implementation
theory, particularly the dimensions of power and strategies of involved actors,
institutional and regime characteristics, as well as compliance and responsiveness of
implementers. The findings show that the implementation of market service
retribution already has a clear legal basis, institutional structure, and operational
mechanism. However, its implementation remains less than optimal due to the gap
between potential revenue and actual realization, the persistence of manual cashbased collection, limited supervision, low trader discipline, and inadequate service
facilities. The study concludes that optimizing market service retribution requires
improved trader data management, stronger supervision of collection officers,
separation of ticketing and payment functions, digitalization through QR Code or epayment, and better market facilities. Strengthening these aspects is essential to
improve local revenue, enhance public service quality, and build trader trust in local
government market management.
References
Grindle, M. S. (1980). Politics and policy implementation in the Third World. New
Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Kaho, J. R. (2010). Prospek otonomi daerah di Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta:
RajaGrafindo Persada.
Malano, H. (2011). Selamatkan pasar tradisional. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Moenir, A. S. (2012). Manajemen pelayanan umum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara.
Nugroho, R. (2016). Kebijakan publik: Formulasi, implementasi, evaluasi. Jakarta:
Elex Media Komputindo.
Panca, K. (2006). Pajak daerah dan retribusi daerah di Indonesia. Malang:
Bayumedia.
Sinambela, L. P. (2006). Reformasi pelayanan publik: Teori, kebijakan, dan
implementasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Susilo. (2022). Optimalisasi retribusi pelayanan pasar umum Kabupaten Blitar.
Ekuitas: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 6(3), 312–332.
Siallagan, D. Y., & Lubis, L. N. (2023). Implementasi kebijakan pemungutan
pembayaran dan penyetoran retribusi pelayanan pasar tradisional melalui
virtual account pada Dinas Koperasi, Usaha Mikro, dan Perdagangan Kota
Pontianak. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 10(3).
Mayasari, L., & Syahrani. (2024). Efektivitas pelaksanaan pemungutan retribusi
pelayanan pasar berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Tabalong
Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 di Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kabupaten Tabalong:
Studi Pasar Kapar. JAPB: Jurnal STIA Tabalong, 7(1).
Regulasi dan Dokumen Kebijakan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2009 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi
Daerah.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 66 Tahun 2001 tentang Retribusi Daerah.
Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 53 Tahun 2008 tentang Pedoman
Penataan dan Pembinaan Pasar Tradisional, Pusat Perbelanjaan, dan Toko
Modern.
Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Majalengka Nomor 7 Tahun 2023 tentang Pajak
Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah.
Peraturan Bupati Majalengka Nomor 90 Tahun 2021 tentang Rincian Tugas,
Fungsi, dan Tata Kerja Dinas Perdagangan dan Perindustrian.
.png)
.png)
