KINERJA CAMAT DALAM IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM PEMBANGUNAN DI KECAMATAN PALU SELATAN KOTA PALU

  • Teguh Dermawan Lubis Universitas Tadulako
  • Sitti Chaeriah Ahsan Universitas Tadulako
  • Muhammad Rapi Universitas Tadulako

Abstract

This research was conducted in south palu District, palu city The results of the researcher's observations showed that there were several people at the South Palu District office who complained about documents that could not be collected on the same day because they had not received the subdistrict head's signature. This raises big questions for researchers about the sub-district head's discipline in carrying out his duties. Does the sub-district head rarely come to the office so that people complain? So research on the performance of the sub-district head in South Palu District is relevant and important to carry out and it is hoped that a comprehensive picture of the sub-district head's performance in implementing development programs can be found.This research aims to find out how the sub-district head performs in implementing the development program in South Palu District, Palu City, using performance theory from Suyadi Prawirosentono, with a qualitative descriptive method. Data collection using observation, interviews, documentation and literature techniques. The results of this research show that the performance of the South Palu Subdistrict Head in implementing development programs in his area can run well based on the theory used as a benchmark for the success of this performance, namely effectiveness and efficiency, proven by his ability to provide real contributions in a structured, controlled and supervised manner. well. The authority and responsibility of the South Palu Subdistrict Head can be seen by the achievement of the Subdistrict Strategic Plan in accordance with his authority. Discipline is an aspect that can be seen by coming and leaving the office on time (unless there are urgent matters such as work outside the office), during working hours he is serious about his work and the work can be completed on time. Initiative, demonstrated by innovation and creativity, can be proven by his ability to implement development programs such as launching the Pelangi 2022 service innovation.

References

Dharma, S. (2005). Manajemen Kinerja Falsafah, Teori dan Penerapannya. Pustaka Pelajar.Dwiyanto, A. (2007). Reformasi Tata Pemerintahan dan Otonomi Daerah. Pusat StudiKependudukan dan KebijakanUniversitas Gadjah Mada.Gary Dessler dalam Agus Dharma (Ed.). (1992). Manajemen Personalia;Teknik dan Konsep Modern, Profesor Of Management FloridaInternational. Erlangga.Handoko. (1998). Manajemen personaliadan Sumber Daya Manusia, edisi 2Ilyas. (1999). Kinerja: Teori Penilaian Dan Penelitian. FKM UI. IQ. PT. Gramedia Pustaka utama.Keban, Y. T. (2008). Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik (Konsep, Teori, Dan Isu). Gava Media.Kumorotomo, S. (2008). Akuntabilitas Birokrasi Publik Sketsa padaMasa Transisi, Pustaka Pelajar.Kusnadi. (2005). Pengantar Manajemen. Unibraw Press.Mangkunegara, Prabu. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, Remaja Rosdakarya.Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. (2006). Evaluasi Kinerja SDM, Cetakan Kedua. PT. Refika Aditama.Miles, B M. & Huberman. (2014). Analisis Data Kualitatif. UniversitasIndonesia Press.Ndraha, T. (2003). Kyberndragi (Ilmu Pemerintahan Baru)(Vol. 1).Jakarta : PT. Rieneka Cipta.Pasolong. (2007). Teori Administrasi Publik. Alfabeta.Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 17 Tahun 2018 tentang KecamatanUndang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah
Prawirosentono, S. (2008). Kebijakan Kinerja Karyawan. PT. Gramedia.Purwanto, E. A., & Kumorotomo, W. (2005). Birokrasi Publik Dalam Sistem Politik Semi Parlementer.Rencana Strategi (Renstra) Palu Selatan Kota Palu. Periode 2021 –2026Robbins, S. P. (1996). Perilaku Organisasi: Konsep, Kontroversi Dan Aplikasi. Prenhallindo.Santoso, P. (2008). Administrasi Publik Teori dan Aplikasi Good Governance. Refika Aditama.Sedarmayanti. (2009). SDM dan Produktivitas Kerja. CV. Mandar Maju.Simanjuntak, P. (2005). Manajemen dan Evaluasi Kerja. Lembaga Penerbit FEUI.Sudarto, A. (1993). Analisis Kinerja Diklat Provinsi Data 1 Jatim Surabaya. J Jurnal. Legislasi Indo, 4(1).Sugiono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif Kualitatif & R&D. Alfabeta.Bandung.Sulistiani, Teguh Ambar. (2009). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Konsep, Teori Dan Pengembangan Dalam Konteks Administrasi Publik. Graha Ilmu.Tangkilisan, H. N. T. (2007). Manajemen Publik. PT. Grasindo.Umam, K. (2010). Perilaku Organisasi. Pustaka Setia.Sumber Lain Putrayana, Dwi Prasastia.2019. Kinerja Camat Dalam PelaksanaanPemerintahan di Kecamatan Balinggi Kabupaten Parigi Moutong. Skripsi.Universitas Tadulako.PaluNi Kadek Mira Yuniarti.2021.Kinerja Aparatur Sipil Negara dikantorKelurahan Lasoani kecamatan Mantikulore Kota Palu.Skripsi. Universitas Tadulako. PaluNur’aena M., Mustainah, Muhammad Rapi 2018. Kinerja Pegawai diKantor Kelurahan Tondo Kecamatan MantikuloreKota Palu. Jurnal Volume 2 No.1. Universitas Tadulako. Palu
Published
2024-06-30
How to Cite
Lubis, T. D., Ahsan, S. C., & Rapi, M. (2024). KINERJA CAMAT DALAM IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM PEMBANGUNAN DI KECAMATAN PALU SELATAN KOTA PALU. Caraka Prabu : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 8(1), 86-98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36859/jcp.v8i1.2002