POLITIK PENATAAN RUANG KOTA KUPANG BERBASIS IDENTITAS FISIK DAN SOSIAL-BUDAYA
Abstract
Decentralization-politics and regional autonomy in Indonesia provide opportunities for local governments to develop their assets and potentials. As autonomous region, Kupang City has assets and potentials to be developed as a symbol of its identity for historical tourism purposes. Its needs a space revitalization for managing assets of Heritage City and Karang City, where Sepe trees grow is sustainable. This article aims to analyze the spatial layout of this City based on physical and socio-cultural identity, as well as provide recommendations for spatial revitalization to create a symbol of identity as one of the Heritage Cities and the City of Karang Sepe in Indonesia. Through literature study, this paper argues that, First, there are many historical buildings from the Dutch, Japanese and Portuguese heritage that are not maintained, not functioning and not recorded as Cultural Heritage Buildings. Second, the ownership status of historical buildings is still a problem that policy makers (NTT Provincial, Kupang City and Kupang Regency Government) have not found a solution, so that the Old City Area remains sustainable. Third, there has no effort to plant species such as the Sepe tree in public areas. Fourth, there has no political commitment from the Kupang City Government to revitalize public space based on physical and socio-cultural identity.
References
Aminah, S. (2018). Konstruksi Identitas Ruang: Dialektika Politico dan Sosio-Historis dalam Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik, Vol. 31 (2), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V31I22018.140-154.
Brenner, N. (2012). What is Crtitical Urban Theory?, in Neil Brenner (ed) Cities for People, Not for Profit. New York: Routledge.
Budihardjo, E. (1991). Arsitektur dan Kota di Indonesia, Cetakan ke-3. Bandung: PT. Alumni.
Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed (III). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ercan, Z. M. (2007). Public Space of Post Industrial Cities and Their Changing Roles. Metu jfa, 24 (1), 115-137.
Farzaneh, M. (2011). Urban Development Planning, Regeneration and Public Participation: A comparison Between the UK and Iran. United Kingdom: Newcastle University.
Randolph, G. dan Kuswardono, P. T. (2018). Kota-Kota Kecil, Kabupaten Urban Di Indonesia:Garis Depan Tantangan-Tantangan Ketenegakerjaan, Migrasi dan Urbanisasi. Laporan Kasus Kota: Kupang, Nusa Tenggara Timur. Kupang : PIKUL, JustJobs Network dan Centre for Policy Research (CPR).
Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, Nature, and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kleden, Y. A. (2018). Arahan Revitalisasi Kawasan Kota Lama, Kota Kupang, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur (Tesis). Malang: Institut Teknologi Nasional Malang.
Lake, R. C., Mberu, Y. B., & Diaz, A. (2019). Elemen-Elemen Pembentuk Sistem Kota -Lama Kupang. Jurnal Arsitektur KOMPOSISI, Vol. 12, Nomor 3, 257-269.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Cambridge USA: Blackwell.
Li, L.H.,Lin. J., Li.X., & Wu, F. (2014). Redevelopment of Urban Village in China - A step towards an effective urban policy? A Case Study of Liede Village in Guangzhou. Journal of Habitat International, (43), 299 - 308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.03.009.
Luitnan, I. A. (2012). Kupang Tempoe Doeloe. Depok: Penerbit Ruas.
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image Of The City. Cambridge : The MIT Press.
Ramlee, M., Omar, D., Yunus, R. M., Samdhi, Z. (2015). Revitalization of Urban Public Spaces: An Overview. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science, (201), 360-367.
Spandou, M., Garcia, C., & Macario, S. (2010). Urban Revitalization and Transport: Local Factors and Driving Forces from a Stakeholders.. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/2591047/.
Carmona, M. (2004). Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. New York: Routledge.
Merrifield, A. (2011). The Right to the City and Beyond: Notes on a Levebrian Reconceptualization. City, 15 (3-4), 468-476.
Okolo, N., & Okolie, A. O. (2010). "Revitalizing Urban Public Spaces in Nigeria Through Vegetative Enclaves". Journal of Environmental Management and Safety, 1(1), 124–130.
Niron, E. S. (2020). Kontestasi Politik Tata Kelola Ruang di Kota Kupang (Tesis). Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.
Sanjaya, I. P. (2014). Pelabuhan Kupang dalam Perdagangan Abad ke-19. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Setiadi, A. (2018). “Strategi Implementasi Konsep Waterfront City Kota Kupang”. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur , 3 (1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v3i1.49.
Stephen, C. (1992). Public Space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Bagwell, S., Evans, G., Witting, A. & Worpole, K.(2012). Public Space Management. London: Metropolitan University.
Therik, W. (2018). Kota Kupang sebagain Heritage City. Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia, 7 (3), 161-167.
Wikrawardana, A. (2009). Membangun Identitas Kota : Sebuah Stategi. Retrieved from https://andryanwikra.wordpress.com/identitas-kota/.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Caraka Prabu, Department of Governmental Sciences, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani as publisher of the journal.
Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Jurnal Caraka Prabu, Department of Governmental Sciences, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal Caraka Prabu are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors.
