FAKTOR DOMESTIK DALAM KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH HUNGARIA TERHADAP PENGUNGSI DAN MIGRAN DARI TIMUR TENGAH PERIODE TAHUN 2015-2019

  • Angga Nurdin Rachmat Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani

Abstract

Hungary has become a party to the 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol on Refugees which requires it to adhere to the principle of non-refoulment towards refugees and migrants from the Middle East who came to the country in 2015. However, in reality Hungary has implemented a policy of detaining and returning refugees even by repressive means. This policy also clearly contradicts the principle of protection against refugees and the policies of the European Union (EU) in which Hungary is a member. The policies taken by Hungary cannot be separated from domestic factors that influence the choice of the Hungarian government to take policies that are contrary to the binding Convention and EU policy. Therefore, this paper seeks to answer what domestic factors influenced Hungary's policies towards refugees and migrants from the Middle East in the 2015-2019 period. This paper uses qualitative methods with data sources obtained from literature studies on various aspects of Hungarian domestic politics. The argument in this study is that Hungarian policy towards refugees and migrants is influenced by domestic factors related to elite interests as a strategy to win political battles in the country related to Viktor Orban's ideas of national identity as the Prime Minister of Hungary as well as leader of the ruling party Fidesz, the dynamics of Hungarian domestic politics. and the strengthening of right-wing populism advocated by Fidesz's party.

References

Amnesty International. 2015. Fenced Out Hungary`s Violations of The Right of
Refugees and Migrants. London: Amnesty International Publications.
Benkova, Livia. 2017. Europe`s Response to the Migration Crisis, Austria Institut
Fur Europea-Und Sicherheitpolitik, Focus No.3 hlm 1-4.
Cantat, Celline. 2019. Governing Migrants and Refugees in Hungary: Politics of
Spectacle, Negligence and Solidarity in Securitising Statedalam Hinger,
Sophie dan Schweitzer, Reinhard. Politics of (Dis) Integration, Cham:
Springer.
De Jesus, Anderson Macedo. 2010. Policy-Making Process and Interest Group:
How do Local Government Association Influence Policy Outcome in
Brazin and Netherland?Brazilian Political Science Review, Vol. 4 No.1
hlm 69-101.
Deak, Andras. 2013. Hungarian Dances – The Origin and the Future of Viktor
Orban`s Revolution, Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, Vol. 11 No.1
hlm 145-168.
Easton, David. 1953. The Political System: AInquiry into the State Political
Science. New York: Alfred A Knopf.
Fatima, Zobi. 2017. Syrian Refugees in Europe: Responses of The EU and Member
State, Journal of European Studies, Vol.33 No.2, hlm 77-90.
Firoozabadi, J.D dan Ashkeri, M.Z. 2016. Neo-Classical Realism in International
Relations, Asian Social Science, Vol.12 No.6 hlm 95-99.
Juhaz, Kriztina. 2017. Assesing Hungary`s Stance on Migration and Asylum in
Light of European and Hungarian Migration Strategis, Politics in Central
Europe, Vol. 13 No. 1, hlm 35-54.
Karolewski, Ireneuz Pawel dan Benedikter, Roland. 2018. Europe`s Migration
Predicament: The European Union`s Refugees` Relocation Scheme versus
the Defiant Central Eastern EuropeanVisegard Group”, Journal of Inter
Regional Studies: Regional and Global Perspective, Vol. 1 hlm 40-53.
Kekesi, Mark Zoltan. 2017. Hungary: Migration and the Policy of Closed Border,
Briefing PaperNo.18. Praha: Association for International Affairs (AMO).
Kiss, L.J. 2000. Nation and Integration at the Turn of Millenium: Duality of
Hungary`s Foreign Policy, Foreign Policy Review, Vol. 6 hlm 82-102.
Kreko, Peter dan Enyedi, Zsolt. 2018. Orban`s Laboratory of Illiberalism, Journal
of Democracy, Vol. 29 No. 3 hlm 39-51.
Pradana. Aldoreza. 2018. National Identity: identity Politics in Hungary`s Refugee
Influx 2015, ISS Brief No. 3.
Rydlinski, Bartosz M. 2018. Viktor Orban – First Amnong Illiberal? Hungarian
and Polish StepTowardPopulist Democracy, On-Line Journal Modelling
the New Europe, No.26 hlm 95-107.
Sainz-Pardo, P.V. 2002. The Contemporary Relevance of the 1951 Convention
Relating to the Status of Refugees, The International Journal of Human
Right, Vol. 6 No. 2 hlm 23-34.
Schweller, Randall L. 2018. The Opposite but Commpatible Nationalism: A
Neocalssical Realist Approach to the Future of US-Tiongkok Relations,
The Chinese Joirnal of International Politics, Vol. 11 No. 1 hlm 23-48.
Synder, Jack. 1991. Myth of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition,
New York: Cornell University Press.
Szoke, Laszlo. 1992. Hungarian Perspective on Emigration and Immigration in the
New European Architecture, International Migration Review, Vol.26 No.2
(Special Issue: The New Europe and International Migration) hlm 305-
323.
Timmer, Andria D. dan Docka-Filipek, Danielle. 2018. Enemies of the Nations:
Understanding the Hungarian State`s Relationship to Humanitarian
NGO`s, Journal of International and Global Studies, Vol. 9 No. 2 hlm 41-
57.
Toomey, Michael. 2018. History, Nationalism and Democracy: Myth and Narrative
in Viktor Orban`s `Illiberal Hungary, New Perspective, Vol. 26 No.1 hlm
87-108.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. 2015. State Parties to the 1951
Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1967 Protocol.
Diakses dari https://www.unhcr.org/protection/basic/3b73b0d63/statesparties-1951-convention-its-1967-protocol.html
Walker, Shaun. 2018. “Orban Election Victory Gives us Mandate to Pass `Stop
Soros Laws`”, The Guardian, 10 April 2018, diakses 15 Agustus 2020.
www.theguardian.com/world/2018/apr/10/orban-election-victory-givesus-mandate-to-pass-stop-soros-laws
Waltz, Kenneth. 1959. Man, the State and War: A Theoritical Analysis. New York:
Columbia University Press
Published
2021-02-07
How to Cite
Rachmat, A. N. (2021). FAKTOR DOMESTIK DALAM KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH HUNGARIA TERHADAP PENGUNGSI DAN MIGRAN DARI TIMUR TENGAH PERIODE TAHUN 2015-2019. Jurnal Academia Praja, 4(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36859/jap.v4i1.241