PENCABUTAN HAK ASUH IBU KANDUNG ATAS ANAK DIBAWAH UMUR PASCA TERJADINYA PERCERAIAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 791/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Bn)

  • Eka Ayu Octaviany Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani
  • Diah Arimbi Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani
  • Zulfika Ikrardini Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani
Keywords: Child Custody (Hadhanah); Judge's Consideration; Revocation of Parental Rights.,, Hak Asuh Anak (Hadhanah); Pertimbangan Hakim; Pencabutan Hak Pengasuhan.,

Abstract

The problem that arises after a divorce is regarding child custody. The law regulates child care, if the child is under 12 (twelve) years of age then the right to care is the mother's right. However, in this study the mother was not responsible for caring for the child, so a lawsuit was filed for revocation of child custody by the plaintiff who was the grandmother of the defendant's child.

The purpose of this research is to find out the considerations of judges in deciding post-divorce child custody cases and to find out the rules and theories that form the basis of judges' considerations in deciding custody cases for minor children.This research uses normative juridical research methods, the data source in this research is secondary data which includes primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. In the primary legal materials, the decision of the Religious Court Number 791/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Bn is used. While secondary legal materials are obtained from journals, previous theses as well as books and articles that can assist research.

This research concludes that the judge's consideration in deciding issues regarding custody is based on applicable positive legal rules and existing theories as well as in decision number 791/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Bn in accordance with Article 156 letter C KHI and the judge's balance and based on the best interests of the child.

References

Andriyansyah & Rendy “Teori hirarki kebutuhan maslow,” Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis. Vol.
7 No. 1 (2022): 10
Erlina faizal, per�mbangan hakim dalam aspek yuridis dan non-yuridis. Jurnal Universitas
Negeri Semarang. Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): 86
Ery Setyanegara, Kebabasan Hakim Memutus Perkara Dalam Konteks Pancasila (Di�njau dari
keadilan “substan�f”). Jurnal ResearchGate.Vol. 44 No. 4 (2016): 461
Mashuril & M. Ridho “Fungsional dan Implikasi Asas Kepen�ngan Terbaik Bagi Anak Yang
Berkonflik dengan Hukum,” Jurnal Unja. Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): 269
Moody Rizqy “Pemenuhan hak anak korban perceraian berdasarkan hukum posi�f Indonesia,”
Jurnal Peneliti. Vol. 9 No 18 (2023) 467-469
Reza maulana “pelaksaan hak asuh anak setelah terjadinya perceraian,” Jurnal Cendekia
Hukum. Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): 296
Risdiana, Habibul “Penerapan Asas batas minimal pembuktian dalam perkara hukum
perdata,” Jurnal ilmiah mandala education. Vol. 7 No 2 (2021): 274.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Anak
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Perkawinan jo Undang-Undang
Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perkawinan
Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 Tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam.
Ilyas M. “Siapa yang berhak atas hak asuh anak setelah perceraian.” Dari
www.hukumonline.com. Diakses pada 23 Mei 2024
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Dari htps://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/.
Khaerun. “Trauma anak pasca terjadinya perceraian.” Dari www.pa-slawi.go.id
Kolom. “Evolusi hak asuh anak dalam putusan-putusan hakim.” Dari www.hukumonline.com.
As� NL. “Tanggung jawab orang tua terhadap anak setelah terjadinya perceraian.” Dari
htps://eprints.uniska-bjm.ac,id.
Published
2024-10-23
How to Cite
Octaviany, E. A., Arimbi, D., & Ikrardini, Z. (2024). PENCABUTAN HAK ASUH IBU KANDUNG ATAS ANAK DIBAWAH UMUR PASCA TERJADINYA PERCERAIAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 791/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Bn). Jurnal Rechtswetenschap : Jurnal Mahasiswa Hukum, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36859/rechtswetenschap.v1i1.2395

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>