RESPON RUSIA TERHADAP SANKSI YANG DIBERLAKUKAN OLEH NATO PASCA-ANEKSASI CRIMEA

  • Soelistyo Bawono Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani
Keywords: Foreign Policy, Sanctions, Crimea, Embargo, Russia, European Union

Abstract

The Crimea referendum decision was considered an illegal decision, and was considered an annexation attempt by Russia. Many countries do not recognize and even condemn the results of the referendum, but Vladimir Putin is not afraid and even continues to sign the law legalizing Crimea as part of Russia. The United States is one of the countries most opposed to the results of the referendum, as a form of disapproval of the United States to the referendum which is considered illegal. The United States imposes sanctions in the form of an economic embargo on Russia, with the intention of weakening Russia from its economic sector, the United States even cooperates with the European Union with a view to narrowing Russia's trading partners, of which the European Union is Russia's largest trading partner, Russia will thereby lose its market in the European Union. The embargo given by the United States to Russia was in the form of: Prohibition of Visas and Freezing of Assets for Russian officials and businessmen, as well as for Russian-owned companies, embargoes in the sector of Sanctions in Russia's financial, industrial and defense sectors, as well as expulsion of Russia from membership G-8. This made Russia implement several foreign policies to overcome these sanctions. This research will further discuss how the foreign policy issued by Russia. Researchers use the neorealism approach, the concept of national interest, and the concept of international cooperation. These concepts will later assist researchers in strengthening research assumptions from existing data. The method used for this research is a qualitative research method.

References

Buku
Aan Komariah, Djam’an Satori (2011). “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif”. Bandung, Alfabeta.
Anthonius. P. Sitepu (2011). Studi Hubungan Internasional. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu
Baldwin, D. (1993). “Neorealism and Neoliberalis: The Contemporary Debate.” (New York: Columbia University Press) hlm. 278.
Basrowi dan Suwandi. (2008). “Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif”. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Coodes, See George. (1991). The Indianized States of Southeast Asia, (Honolulu: East-West Center Press,), in Douglas Allen and Ngo Vinh Long, Coming to Term; Indochina, the United States and the War, (United Kingdom: Westview Press, hlm. 91
Departemen Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. 2008 . Buku Putih Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Dephan RI, hal 18.
Dougherty, J. E., & Pfaltzgraff, R. L. (1997). “Contending Theories of International Relation: A Comprehensive Survey” (4th Edition ed.). New York: Ed Addison Weslwy Longman
Frederick H. Hartmann. (1967). “The Relation of Nations”. New York: Macmillan
John W ,Creswell. 2010. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.
Kenneth N. Waltz. (1979). “Theory of International Politics”. New York: Random House
Moleong, Lexy J. (2015). “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif”. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya
Munif, Achmad. (2007). 50 Tokoh Legendaris Dunia, (Yogyakarta: Narasi)
Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu dan Yanyan, Mochamad Yani. (2005). “Pengantar Ilmu Hubungan Internasional.” Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Rachmat, Angga Nurdin. (2015). “Keamanan Global: Transformasi Isu Keamanan Pasca Perang Dingin”. Bandung; Alfabeta. Hal. 9.
Robert Jackson & George Sorenson. (2013). “Pengantar Studi Hubungan Internasional Edisi Kelima”. Jakarta. Pustaka Pelajar
Rosenau, James N. (1969). International Politics and Foreign Policy: A Reader in Research and Theory,. New York: The Free Press, 180-185.
Rudy, Teuku May. (2002). “Studi Strategis: Dalam Transformasi Sistem Internasional Pasca Perang Dingin”. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Soeprapto. (1997) . “Hubungan Internasional: Sistem, Interaksi, dan Perilaku.” Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Suci, Afred. (2011). 151 Konspirasi Dunia Paling Gila dan Mencengangkan!, (Jakarta: Wahyumedia)
Sudarsono, Juwono. (2007). “Postur Pertahanan Negara.” Kementerian Pertahanan RI. Jakarta, 25
Sudarsono, Juwono. “Doktrin Pertahanan Negara.” Kementerian Pertahanan RI, Loc., Cit. hal. 104
Sudarwan Danim.2002. MenjadiPenelitiKualitatif, Bandung :Pustaka Setia.
Sugiyono. (2006). “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D.” Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. (2007). “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D.” Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. (2010). “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D.” Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. (2012). “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D.” Bandung: Alfabeta
Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. (2011). “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan.” Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Swantoro, P. (2007). Masalalu Selalu Aktual, (Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara,),
Vickery, Michael. (1991) “Cambodia”, in Douglas Allen and Ngo Vinh Long, Coming to Term; Indochina, the United States and the War, (United Kingdom: Westview Press)
Artikel
Daniel S.papp, Contemporary International Relations :Framework For Understanding, (US Macmilan college,1994).
Fahmi, S. A., & Utomo, T. C. (2020). Analisis Keberlangsungan Sanksi Ekonomi Uni Eropa Terhadap Rusia Yang Dianggap Menganeksasi Krimea Periode 2014-2019. Journal of International Relations, 6(4), 598-607.
Kartini, I. (2016). Aneksasi rusia di krimea dan konsekuensi bagi ukraina. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 11(2), 15.
Lyubchenko, O. (2017). The Ukrainian Crisis. Acta Politologica, 9(1), 45-60.
Mahendra, I. I. (2022). Kebijakan Rusia untuk Bertahan Menghadapi Sanksi Ekonomi Uni-Eropa di Tahun 2016-2020 Melalui Strategi Import Substitution. Jurnal Pena Wimaya, 2(1).
Marples, D. R., & Duke, D. F. (1995). Ukraine, Russia, and the question of Crimea. Nationalities papers, 23(2), 261-289.
Muhammad, A., & Athifi, M. F. (2021). Aneksasi Rusia atas Krimea, Sanksi Uni Eropa, dan Penguatan Hubungan Strategis antara Rusia-Tiongkok. Insignia: Journal of International Relations, 8(2), 132-144.
Noorkusuma, F. K. (2017). ANALISA KEBIJAKAN INTERVENSI POLITIK RUSIA DI WILAYAH CRIMEA UKRAINA (PADA MASA VLADIMIR PUTIN TAHUN 2012-2014) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Muhammadiyah Malang).
Wilson, A. (2014). Ukraine crisis: What it means for the West. Yale University Press.
Yekelchyk, S. (2020). Ukraine: What Everyone Needs to Know®. Oxford University Press, USA.
Published
2025-10-03
How to Cite
Bawono, S. (2025). RESPON RUSIA TERHADAP SANKSI YANG DIBERLAKUKAN OLEH NATO PASCA-ANEKSASI CRIMEA. Diplomacy and Global Security Journal : Jurnal Mahasiswa Magister Hubungan Internasional, 2(2), 614-636. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36859/dgsj.v2i2.4569