GOVERNANCE: STATIC, DYNAMIC, AND CHAOTIC
Abstract
Governance is the key success of Government. The reforming governance among developing countries is difficult, costly, and exhausted. It was caused by the less-comprehensive of the understanding of governance itself. There are three types or mode of governance, historically: static, dynamic, and chaotic. The static is governance concept which was develop in 1980s and still as mainstream until today practices among Government, includes in Indonesia. The finding of the second types of dynamic governance has been introduced, but in fact it was facing some new challenges from character of the people to the policy. Some countries with factor of a fit culture for dynamic governance are effectively able to develop the capabilities to exercise governance. Some other countries do not have, or they have but insufficient. Chaotic governance is the new imperative for today and tomorrow government. It is governance in the digital age. Scholars and leaders of Governments need to have a same premise and commitment to use the recent technology of digital profoundly.
References
------------------, 2010, Democratic Governance, Princetown: Princetown University Press.
Bhatta, Gambhir, 2015 (2006), International Dictionary of Public Management and Governance, London: Routledge; see also the World Bank definition.
Boon Siong Neo and Geraldine Chen, 2007, Dynamic Governance: Embedding Capabilities and Change in Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Clinton, Bill , 2011, Back to Work: Why We Need Smart Government for a Strong Economy, New York: Free Press.
Collins, Jim, 2005, Good to Great and the Social Sectors: Why Business Thinking is Not the Answer, New York: Harper & Collins.
De Vries, Michiel S., & Pan Suk Kim, 2011, Value and Virtue in Public Administration, A Comparative Perspective, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Garofalo, Charles, 2011, “Governance and Values in Contemporary Public Service”, in Michiel S. De Vries and Pan Suk Kim, 2011, Value and Virtue in Public Administration, A Comparative Perspective, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hubbard, Ruth, and Gilles Paquet, 2010, The Black Hole of Public Administration, Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, p. 109.
Huberts, Leo W.J.C., Jeroen Maesschalck and Carole L. Jurkiewicz, eds., 2008, Ethics and integrity of governance : perspectives across frontiers, Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing Limited
Kasim, Azar, Martani Huseini, Rozan Anwar, Boon Siong Neo, 2015, Merekonstruksi Indonesia: sebuah perjalanan menuju dynamic governance, Jakarta: Kompas.
Raadschelders, Jos C.N., Eran Vigoda-Gadot, and Mirit Kisner, 2015, Dimension of Public Administration and Governance, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, p.1.
Riant Nugroho & Rizang Wrihatnolo, 2006, Manajemen Privatisasi BUMN, Jakarta: Elex/Gramedia.
Ohmae, Kenichi, 1990, The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy, New York: Harper Business.
-------------------------- , 1995, The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies. New York: The Free Press.
Nugroho, Riant. 2018. Public Policy, Jakarta: Elex/Gramedia
--------------------------, 2012, Public Policy for the Developing Countries, Yogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
--------------------------, 2018, Membangun Kebijakan Karakter Bangsa, Jakarta: Elex/Gramedia.
--------------------------, “Public Private Partnership as a Policy Dilemma”, International Journal of Administrative Science & Organization, September 2011 Volume 18, Number 3
Schuck, Peter H., 2014, Why Government Fails So Often: And How It Can Do Better, Princeton: Princeton University Press
Yescombe, E. R., & Edward Farquharson, 2018 (2006), Public-Private Partnerships for Infrastructure, Oxford: Butterworth & Heinemman.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Academia Praja, Department of Master of Governmental Sciences, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani as publisher of the journal.
Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Jurnal Academia Praja, Department of Master of Governmental Sciences, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal Academia Praja are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors
